Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrii Tretiak's avatar

For me the scary number here is not 27% to 9%, it's what happens five years later. We also stopped hiring juniors, and I understand why everybody does it, an agent does the junior tasks faster. But seniors don't appear from nowhere, they are juniors who made a lot of mistakes on real projects. And the thing managers now look for, judgment, is exactly what you can't get without those years. I started to think that a junior today should learn to check the agent's work instead of writing the code, because that's where judgment grows now. Did the report say anything about how the juniors who still get hired are trained?

Ready for more?